Artificial Beings


Thinking machines and artificial beings appear in Greek myths, such as Talos of Crete, the golden robots of Hephaestus and Pygmalion's Galatea. Human likenesses believed to have intelligence were built in every major civilization: animated statues were seen in Egypt and Greece. It was also widely believed that artificial beings had been created in the past. By the 19th and 20th centuries, artificial beings had become a common feature in fiction, as in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.



But did you know that the idea of artificial beings has long been recognized and existing in almost all legal systems in the world?
*****
A corporation is one such artificial being. A corporation is an entity separate and distinct from its stockholders. While not in fact and in reality a person, the law treats a corporation as though it were a person by process of fiction or by regarding it as an artificial person distinct and separate from its individual stockholders.
*****
A corporation is an institution that is granted a charter recognizing it as a separate legal entity having its own privileges, and liabilities distinct from those of its members. There are many different forms of corporations, most of which are used to conduct business. Despite not being natural persons, corporations are recognized by the law to have rights and responsibilities like actual people. Corporations can exercise human rights against real individuals and the state, and they may be responsible for human rights violations. Just as they are "born" into existence through its members obtaining a certificate of incorporation, they can "die" when they lose money into insolvency.
*****
Corporations exist as a product of corporate law, and their rules balance the interests of the management who operate the corporation, creditors, shareholders, and employees who contribute their labor. In modern times, corporations have become an increasingly dominant part of economic life.
*****
An important feature of corporation is limited liability. If a corporation fails, shareholders normally only stand to lose their investment, and employees will lose their jobs, but neither will be further liable for debts that remain owing to the corporation's creditors.
*****
Corporate officers may act on such matters as may be authorized either expressly by the By-laws or Board Resolutions or impliedly such as by general practice or policy or as are implied by express powers. When officers are allowed to act in certain particular cases, their acts conformably therewith can bind the company. Hence, a corporate officer entrusted with general management and control of the business has the implied authority to act or contract for the corporation which may be necessary or appropriate to conduct the ordinary business. If the act of corporate officers comes within corporate powers but it is done without any express or implied authority therefor from the by-laws, board resolutions or corporate practices, such an act does not bind the corporation. The Board, however, acting within its competence, may ratify the unauthorized act of the corporate officer. So, too, a corporation may be held in estoppel from denying as against innocent third persons the authority of its officers or agents who have been clothed by it with ostensible or apparent authority.
*****
By legal fiction, a corporation has a personality separate and distinct from its officers, stockholders and members. The corporation has a separate existence and there is a veil or shroud which separates the corporation from its stockholders and members. That is why obligations incurred by the corporation are its sole liabilities, and are not the obligations of its stockholders or members. Conversely, officers of a corporation are not personally liable for their official acts unless it is shown that they have exceeded their authority.
*****
However, there are instances when the corporate fiction or the notion that the corporation is a separate legal entity may be disregarded. Piercing the veil of corporate entity requires the court to see through the protective shroud which exempts its stockholders from liabilities that ordinarily, they could be subject to, were it not for the existing corporate fiction. But to do this, the court must be sure that the corporate fiction was misused, to such an extent that injustice, fraud, or crime was committed upon another, disregarding, thus, his, her, or its rights. It is the protection of the interests of innocent third persons dealing with the corporate entity which the law aims to protect by this doctrine.
*****
The mere ownership by a single stockholder of all or nearly all of the capital stock of a corporation is not of itself a sufficient reason for disregarding the fiction of separate corporate personalities.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites